Vfa Agreement News

Last February, the State Department informed the United States of the denunciation of the 1998 agreement, which legally covers military exercises between U.S. and Philippine troops. This is not to say that the suspension of the withdrawal of the Philippine US VFA is not good news for the alliance – it is undoubtedly the case and supporters on both sides deserve to be credited for temporarily preventing a blow to the alliance. But it is hoped that this period will give some air to both sides, not only to avoid the next crisis or to conduct ongoing cooperation, but also to overcome some of the fundamental issues of the alliance that cannot simply wait for the change of direction of one or both sides. While the 2014 Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) provides access to certain locations for certain activities such as exercises and training sessions, it does not cover the status of U.S. military and civilian personnel. Without the VFA, it is unlikely that the United States would wish to conduct business in the Philippines without the protection of its personnel, as covered by the VFA agreement. “Without this agreement, we are jeopardizing the activities that greatly appreciate the different defense facilities, the different services in the Philippines,” he said. Ridon also asked the president not to be swayed by US military equipment and they would have more to lose in denouncing the deal. The VFA is a 1998 agreement between Manila and Washington on protocol for U.S.

military personnel in the country. Controversial provisions include the lax visa and passport policy of U.S. troops and the power granted to the U.S. government to retain jurisdiction over military personnel if they ever commit crimes on the ground. On June 1, the Philippine government informed the United States. Message to Manila that it has frozen a February decision to withdraw from the Philippine Visiting Forces (VFA) agreement. The agreement between the two countries facilitates the possibility for the United States to send armed forces to the Philippines and supports the Mutual Defense Treaty signed by the governments of the United States and the Philippines in 1951. The Philippine Alliance, born in 1951 by the Mutual Defense Treaty, it was not unknown to stress test sessions, whether it was the renegotiation of the terms of the basic agreement in the 1970s or the closure of US military facilities in the early 1990s (which, let us recall, led to the VFA of 1999 only after the growing perception of the Philippine threat to China). From that perspective, Duterte`s assumption of the presidency has led to the alliance`s biggest stress test in decades, with its efforts to distance Manila from Washington and seek closer relations with China and Russia facing a few obstacles, but continuing to cause periodic crises and slowing cooperation between the U.S. and the Philippines in some areas. Paradoxically, the fatal blow for the VFA could come from Washington itself and not from Manila. Asked about his thoughts on Dutertes` denunciation of the deal, Trump replied: “I don`t mind if they want to do it.

It will save a lot of money. . My point of view is different from others. Trump`s statement underscores his general lack of esteem for international agreements and alliances in favor of his “America First” policy. The two leaders, however, spoke on April 19 and it was unclear whether the VFA appeared. Regardless of what happens, the fate of the VFA will determine the tone of the Alliance, at least for the rest of Dutertes` term until 2022, if not beyond.